| |
Yet
even
with
the
Marcos’
removal
of
power,
the
country’s
problems
continued,
partly
because
of
the
system-wide
corruption
that
blossomed
under
Marcos.
The
witty
archbishop
once
cleverly
remarked,
“We
got
rid
of
Ali
Baba,
but
the
40
thieves
remained.”
In
January
2001,
Sin
also
helped
lead
“People
Power
2” –
street
protests
that
were
once
again
centered
on
EDSA,
leading
to
the
ouster
of
President
Joseph
Estrada
over
allegations
of
corruption
and
misrule.
In
2003,
an
ailing
Sin,
suffering
kidney
ailments,
retired
after
serving
as
Manila
Archbishop for
29
years,
and
spent
his
time
in
quiet
seclusion
in
his
residence
in Mandaluyong
City.
While
he
was
revered
by
most
Filipinos,
Sin
was
often
criticized
for
his
active
advocacies.
Critics
branded
him
a
“politician-priest”
and
said
that
he
interfered
in
political
matters
in
which
the
church
should
have
kept
its
distance,
citing
the
policy
of
separation
of
church
and
state.
To
this,
Sin
replied,
“Politics
without
Christ
is
the
greatest
scourge
of
our
nation,”
in
his
retirement
speech
in
2003.
INSTRUMENT
FOR
CHANGE
Perhaps
Cardinal
Sin
will
best
be
remembered
for
his
strong
statements
on
the
important
issues
affecting
the
country.
Sin
strongly
opposed
changes
to
the
Philippine
Constitution.
He
believed
that
Charter
change
would
only
benefit
politicians,
a
“poorly
disguised
pursuit
of
self-interest.”
He
also
campaigned
for
clean
and
honest
elections,
citing
electoral
fraud
as
the
trigger
that
caused
the
1986
EDSA
revolution.
The
Archbishop
issued
guidelines
that
would
help
voters
elect
the
country’s
next
public
officials.
In
President
Fidel
V.
Ramos’
time,
the
government’s
health
department,
led
then
by
Secretary
Juan
Flavier,
strongly
pushed
for
a
family
planning
program
with
the
use
of
artificial
contraceptives.
Cardinal
Sin
led
the
Catholic
Church
in
opposing
the
plan;
he
said
that
contraceptive
use
would
only
promote
promiscuity.
Like
his
friend,
the
late
Pope
John
Paul
II,
Sin
won
the
respect
of
people
from
all
walks
of
life.
“We
Filipinos
will
truly
miss
Cardinal
Sin.
He
earned
respect
among
Catholics
and
non-Catholics
alike
because
of
his
countless
social
contributions
to
the
nation,”
said
Louie,
a
businessman
from
Manila.
In
fact,
during
Pope
John
Paul’s
first
historic
trip
to
the
country,
he
chose
to
stay
at
Cardinal
Sin’s
residence
instead
of
the
government-built
Coconut
Palace.
“We
are
thankful
to
God,
who
has
given
us
two
great
men
who
had
both
touched
the
lives
of
so
many
people,
Pope
John
Paul
II
and
Cardinal
Sin,”
sys
Mikee,
an
office
assistant
from
Makati.
Despite
the
criticisms
against
him,
Jaime
Cardinal
Sin
was
as
inspirational
leader.
He
was
decisive
and
courageous,
strong-willed
and
intellectual,
and
yet
he
truly
cared
for
his
flock,
the
Filipino
Catholic
populace.
“He
stood
against
Marcos
when
many
others,
including
those
in
the
Church,
refused
to
take
sides.
Some
may
disagree
with
the
political
stances
he
took,
but
he
was
brave
enough
to
speak
out
for
what
he
felt
was
moral,
even
if
society
found
his
views
inconvenient
and
sometimes
too
traditional,”
remarks
Marlon,
a
student
in
Quezon
City.
Even
those
who
vehemently
disagreed
with
his
policies
and
his
views
will
agree
that
he
only
had
the
best
interests
of
the
Philippines
at
heart.
Jaime
Cardinal
Sin
served
the
people
unconditionally.
He
was
truly
an
instrument
for
change.
Filipinos
everywhere
hope
that
his
legacy
of
taking
a
stand
and
doing
what
is
best
for
the
country
will
live
on
forever.
DP |
|